Chicago Bankruptcy Attorney
Chicago Bankruptcy Lawyer Attorney Profiles Bankruptcy Frequently Asked Questions Bankruptcy Blog Bankruptcy Evaluation Testimonials Locations / Contact Us
Bankruptcy Information
Bankruptcy Process
Chapter 7
Chapter 13
Bankruptcy Myths
Bankruptcy Timeline
Benefits of Bankruptcy
Chapter 7 vs. Chapter 13
Credit Repair
Creditor Harassment
Eliminating 2nd Mortgages
Types of Debt Eliminated
What Bankruptcy Can Do For You
Why Choose Our Firm
Will I Lose Anything?
Click here to take our FREE online Bankruptcy Evaluation
Click Here To Join Our Network
Contact Chicago a Bankruptcy Attorney
We proudly accept

DISCHARGING STUDENT LOANS IN BANKRUPTCY

Beginning in the 1970's, many college graduates chose to discharge their student loan debt immediately after graduation. As a result, Congress tightened the restrictions on discharging government-backed student loan debt, and by 1998 federal student loans were not dischargeable except under circumstances of undue hardship.  Today the standard is whether repayment of the student loan "would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor's dependents."

"Undue hardship" seems like an easy hurdle to clear; if you are broke, the choice may be buying food or paying on the student loan, right?  Unfortunately, courts have taken a very narrow and hard-line approach in construing the "undue hardship" standard.  Consequently, it is very difficult to discharge student loans in bankruptcy.  A good example of this is found in the recent case of Wallace v. Educational Credit Management Corp.,2010 WL 5764771 (Bky.S.D. Ohio Dec. 1, 2010).

The bankruptcy debtor in Wallace graduated with a bachelor's degree in sociology and had over $30,000 in student loan debt. Wallace was able to work one year making a little over $12,000 before being forced to quit working due to complications from diabetes. Over the next few years he lost one eye, and had a kidney and pancreas removed.  By 2008, he was legally blind and receiving $811 each month in social security disability.  His monthly expenses were determined to be $790.

Wallace and his attorney filed an adversary case in the bankruptcy court seeking to discharge the student loan debt under the "undue hardship" standard.  The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio looked at three factors (known as the Brunner test) in reaching its decision:

1.  whether Wallace could maintain a "minimal" standard of living if forced to repay the student loan debt;

2.  whether additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the student loan repayment period; and

3.  whether Wallace made a good faith effort to repay the student loans.

The Ohio Bankruptcy Court decided that while the first prong of the Brunner test was met, Wallace "failed to demonstrate that his state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period of the Loan." The Bankruptcy Court ordered Wallace to pay $20 per month, but stayed final judgment on the issue until 2012 and would review the case at that time.  In a bit of ironic prose, the court stated that "It remains to be seen into which group Wallace will land, whether he will find work or remain unemployed." 

As you can see from the Wallace case, student loans are very difficult to discharge.  If you believe you can meet the undue hardship test, discuss your with an experienced bankruptcy attorney.  While not impossible, discharging student loans is indeed a very high bar to clear.

Contact the experienced Chicago Bankruptcy Attorneys at Glanzer & Angres, P.C. at 1-877-337-2227 to discuss your specific situation, and to schedule your free, in-person consultation.
Click here to read more information about our bankruptcy fees
Click here for more information on Eliminating a Second Mortgage
Eliminate Debt and Stop Foreclosure, Garnishments, Levies, and Liens
We are a debt relief agency. We help people file for bankruptcy under the bankruptcy code.

Attorney Web DesignThe information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.

Chicago Office: 101 W. Grand Ave., Suite 200 Chicago, IL 60654 Phone: 312-544-0365
South Side Office: 3317-19 W. 95th Street Evergreen Park, IL 60805